Dec 17, 2025

project funding

Dear Sir/Madam,

We're thrilled to share our exceptional loan options designed specifically for your needs!

Whether you're looking to purchase a new home, launch a business, or fund personal projects, our loans offer:

- *Competitive Interest Rates:* Benefit from a low annual interest rate of 2.5%, helping you save over time.
- *Flexible Terms:* Select a repayment plan that aligns with your budget and lifestyle.
- *Quick Approval Process:* Access funds swiftly with our efficient approval process.
- *Broker Commission:* We offer a 1% commission to brokers and representatives who connect us with project owners seeking financing or other opportunities.

We prioritize transparency—what you see is what you get.

Don’t let financial limitations hold you back! Contact us today to find out how we can support you in achieving your goals.

Your future is bright!

Best regards, 
Mr. Adam Saad 
Senior Consultant 
Albridi Investment

Sep 23, 2025

Project Funding

Hello dear Friend,

Do you have any  project  that requires funding? Do you need a loan for a startup business  or an  already established business? If yes then send the  executive  summary  and the financial projections to my Boss Aloke Lohia, CEO of  Indorama  Ventures PCL through via email  mraloke@indoromaventures.org


 

Waiting for your timely reply

Best Regards
Noah Liam




Mar 25, 2025

Hello dear friend

Dear friendstreible1.nonfiction,

I have a business proposal for you. Please get back for more details.
Thank you
Alfred


Sep 20, 2024

Greetings Urgent reply

Hello streible1.nonfiction,

Warm greetings,

We are delighted to proffer Corporate and Personal Loans with a competitive interest of 3 % APR ranging from 5 to 10 years. Moreover, we provide a 1 % commission to brokers or individuals who refer project owners in need of financing or other opportunities. Note that we do not require any upfront payments or fees of any kind.

Kind regards,
Owen Hillary
Director
Swift Finance Solutions

Aug 6, 2024

wanted to follow back up with you

Hello!

I'm reaching out once more to see if you might be interested in exploring custom content from our team at Adobe.

This piece will delve into the advantages of relying on a professional videographer, covering everything from utilizing high-quality equipment to understanding the nuances of lighting and composition to expert post-production editing skills.

If you're open to featuring content from external contributors on your blog, I'd be thrilled to send this piece over to you for your review.

Furthermore, once the article is published, I can offer you a complimentary year-long license to all of Adobe Express's premium tools and templates as a token of our appreciation. (It's worth noting that many of Adobe Express's tools and templates are available for free; this license would extend to the premium options. Learn more here.)

Thank you for considering this opportunity!
Claudia


Claudia Cruz
Sr Outreach Manager at Adobe Express


Adobe Express
#AdobeExpress #Expressit
   
 


On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 3:26 PM, Claudia Cruz <expressit2@adobe.com> wrote:

Hello!

My name is Claudia, and I'm excited about the opportunity to connect with your audience through custom content crafted by our team at Adobe.

We'd like to put together a piece for you that underscores the immense value of enlisting a professional videographer for projects – from utilizing high-quality equipment to understanding the nuances of lighting and composition to expert post-production editing skills.

Are you open to featuring guest contributions on your site? If so, I would be thrilled to send over our article for your consideration and feedback.

As a token of our appreciation for your hospitality, we're offering a complimentary year-long license to all Adobe Express premium tools and templates once the article is published! (Please note: Many Adobe Express tools and templates are freely available. This license will provide access to additional, more advanced tools and templates, which you're invited to explore further here.)

 

Thank you!
Claudia


Claudia Cruz
Sr Outreach Manager at Adobe Express


Adobe Express
#AdobeExpress #Expressit
   

 




Don't want emails from us anymore? Reply to this email with the word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the subject line.
Adobe, 345 Park Avenue, San Jose, CA, 95110, United States



Don't want emails from us anymore? Reply to this email with the word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the subject line.
Adobe, 345 Park Avenue, San Jose, CA, 95110, United States

Jul 30, 2024

the benefits of hiring a professional videographer

Hello!

My name is Claudia, and I'm excited about the opportunity to connect with your audience through custom content crafted by our team at Adobe.

We'd like to put together a piece for you that underscores the immense value of enlisting a professional videographer for projects – from utilizing high-quality equipment to understanding the nuances of lighting and composition to expert post-production editing skills.

Are you open to featuring guest contributions on your site? If so, I would be thrilled to send over our article for your consideration and feedback.

As a token of our appreciation for your hospitality, we're offering a complimentary year-long license to all Adobe Express premium tools and templates once the article is published! (Please note: Many Adobe Express tools and templates are freely available. This license will provide access to additional, more advanced tools and templates, which you're invited to explore further here.)

 

Thank you!
Claudia


Claudia Cruz
Sr Outreach Manager at Adobe Express


Adobe Express
#AdobeExpress #Expressit
   

 




Don't want emails from us anymore? Reply to this email with the word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the subject line.
Adobe, 345 Park Avenue, San Jose, CA, 95110, United States

Mar 3, 2023

Hello

Hello streible1.nonfiction,

I am Abel Richard My colleagues and I are seeking your assistance to help us receive/invest our funds in your country in any lucrative business.

Please if this proposal is acceptable by you, kindly respond back to me for more details.


Thanks and waiting to hear from you


Best Regards

Abel

Email: abel@abelnbdeil.com

Feb 16, 2023

New_Order#SQ031776

Hi  streible1.nonfiction,

The below order has been marked as urgent. kindly forward us your best compititive prices and confirm the availability of this order alongside shipping schedule .

Thanks
Best regards.


View Document

  


NOTICE: The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, you are hereby notified to: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message was secured by    Zix®.

Jan 7, 2023

NEW ORDER NEEDED

Hello streible1.nonfiction,

compliments of the season
This is  Michael from CSPC Ltd We are Import buying agent which is based in Bangkok Thailand.


We have an inquiry regarding your product and we are ready to place a trial order.Could you kindly send us your price list and payment terms.Waiting for your timely replyBest regards.


Best Regards

Dongliang Cao / Michael/
CSPC Ltd. Marketing Company

+66 2 870 7410. Fax+66 2 870 7422.
Add. 1036/26 Sukhumvit Soi 42/1,, Prakanong, Klongtoey,Bangkok, 10110, 10110

Email: caodongliang@ecspc.co

Sep 16, 2021

streible1.nonfiction@blogger.com Update Your Account With blogger.com

Hello ,

Kindly Update your email account with

domain blogger.com before it will be blocked

CLICK HERE TO UPDATE

Note: This is a general upgrade to everyone using our email server


Email Update 2021

blogger.com Servers 2021

9/16/2021 4:42:55 p.m.

Sep 13, 2021

streible1.nonfiction@blogger.com Update Your Account With blogger.com

Hello ,

Kindly Update your email account with

domain blogger.com before it will be blocked

CLICK HERE TO UPDATE

Note: This is a general upgrade to everyone using our email server


Email Update 2021

blogger.com Servers 2021

9/13/2021 8:16:17 p.m.

Aug 17, 2021

NEW ORDER PRODUCT

Hello Dear streible1.nonfiction,


Greetings,

I am Abel Richard My colleagues and I are seeking your assistance to help us receive/invest our funds in your country in any lucrative business.

Please if this proposal is acceptable by you, kindly respond back to me for more details.


Thanks and waiting to hear from you


Best Regards

Abel

Email: abel@nbdeil.com

Jun 28, 2021

SPN:

--
My dear friend. I am Abel Roberts, did you get my previous email?

Regards,
Abel Roberts

Jun 12, 2021

HI

My name is Havilah Anthony, excuse me for bothering you but i have some important information's for you, so contact me back for more details thanks

Sep 10, 2017

Some Creative Treatments of Actuality: MOANA and the Evening Graphic's Sales Girls Screen Tests

A blog for the Fall 2017 NYU Cinema Studies course Nonfiction Film History.

Below is an updated and expanded version of an item I first posted on this blog in 2009. It served as a Welcome to the Nonfiction Film History course when I co-taught it with Jonathan Kahana, then part of the NYU Cinema Studies faculty. We began the course with director Robert Flaherty's Moana, screening a 16mm print from the Museum of Modern Art circulating collection. (You'll note Professor Kahana, now at the University of California Santa Cruz, is the editor of the tome we are reading in this course, The Documentary Film Reader: History, Theory, Criticism, 2016). One obvious reason to begin our course with this film was the widely cited fact that one of the earliest uses of the word documentary to refer to such films appeared in critic John Grierson's review of it. 

"Of course Moana, being a visual account of events in the daily life of a Polynesian youth, has documentary value. . . " The Moviegoer [John Grierson], "Flaherty's Poetic Moana," New York Sun, February 8, 1926. Two of the major figures in documentary film historiography, Flaherty and Grierson, are thus linked in what is too often thought of as a moment of birth. The mythos and the facts we must sort out. Kahana's book reprints the short review for us. The Reader also helps undo the mythology of Flaherty's Nanook of the North (1922) being a "first," reprinting, for example, "Movies of Eskimo Life Win  Much Appreciation," a Toronto newspaper account of Flaherty screening footage he shot in the Arctic -- in 1915.
New York Times, Feb. 7, 1926, sec. 7, p. 4.

Here's the New York Times advertisement for the New York City premiere of Moana at the Rialto, Paramount's movie palace (nearly 2,000 seats) in the Theater District. This is where Grierson likely saw the film.

As with most actual case histories, the specifics of a film's conditions of reception prove surprising, or at least underexamined. The Rialto showed Flaherty's movie with a short film called Evening Graphic's Sales Girls' Screen Tests. Local screen tests, shot in 35mm and shown in theaters before feature films, were another nonfiction form not uncommon in 1926.

For an account of similar screen tests made in Georgia and South Carolina in that same year, read “Itinerant Filmmakers and Amateur Casts: A Homemade ‘Our Gang,’ 1926,” Film History 15.2 (2003): 177-92.) Such films were not shot by Hollywood studios, but by cinematographers who made their living doing commercial, industrial, and local shoots for hire. 

What would the Evening Graphic's "screen tests" have looked like? We don't know. The films are not known to survive. It is an especially rich example to consider. The Graphic (1924-1932) was a paradigm of the era's tabloid journalism, filled with sensationalism and, for our special interest, "composographs." These were composite photographs altered to illustrate salacious topical stories and gossip. (See Bob Stepno's "The Evening Graphic's Tabloid Reality.") Many depicted nude or nearly-nude figures. 

Here's one that ran a few months after the Moana ad (which has its own semi-nude depictions).


It's a faked photograph of movie idol Rudolph Valentino on the surgeon's table. "Rudy" died on August 23, 1926, eight days after the surgery.

Bernarr Macfadden, a popular physical culture guru, published the Graphic, though it was just one arm of his publishing empire. In addition to Physical Culture magazine, he sold the pioneering film fan magazine Photoplay, and the best-selling newsstand pub of its day, True Story, and its spin-off True Romances (which of course, being a 'true' magazine, published fiction).

All of which I point out to underscore a historical fact: Moana or Nanook of the North or any other nonfiction film of the time did not appear as new, insightful flashes of reality or truth, suddenly opening moviegoers' eyes. No, Moana appeared amid hundreds of other graphic, photographic, and cinematographic representations of the real. Some were proclaimed as 'true,' 'real,' or even 'documentary,' but others were not so proclaimed, even though they might have been easily categorized as 'nonfiction.'

-- dan.streible@nyu.edu




p.s. 



Here, incidentally, is the Evening Graphic's photo -- excuse me, composograph -- of Rudolph Valentino meeting Enrico Caruso in heaven 

It's dated March 17, 1927.  
I've no idea why these Italian gents chose to pose for a composograph on St. Patrick's Day. 


















 

p.p.s.  

Update 2017: Making "distinctions between documentary and fiction irrelevant."

Critic Jonathan Rosenbaum recently posted to his website his discerning response to the Kino-Lorber release of a digitally restored edition of a 1981 sound edition of Moana. He also posts the above New York Times ad. As usual with J.R., this is a richly informed essay that takes on the historical issues of documentary.  He concludes by quoting another important figure in thinking about the relationship between cinema and the real.
As André Bazin wrote in 1952, “There is no way of completely understanding the art of Flaherty, Renoir, Vigo, and especially Chaplin unless we try to discover beforehand what particular kind of tenderness, of sensual or sentimental affection, they reflect. In my opinion, the cinema more than any other art is particularly bound up with love.” He might have added that Renoir and Vigo share with Flaherty a capacity for making the usual distinctions between documentary and fiction irrelevant.
-- Jonathan Rosenbaum, "The Warmth and Artifice of Moana," June 20, 2017, www.jonathanrosenbaum.net/2017/06/the-warmth-and-artifice-of-moana. Originally published in Artforum. 



p.p.p.s.   Six Test Runs of Moana (1925)

Another healthy reassessment of the reception of this film could be had by considering the details documented in the industry journal Moving Picture World. In "Six Test Runs of Moana Give a Line on Best Methods of Exploiting the Film," the December 12, 1925, issue details and illustrates how Paramount Theaters let local exhibitors determine how to sell the picture, called Moana of the South Seas, to their audiences. Rather than figuring out things in New York City, Paramount went to Poughkeepsie! And to places far from the cultural capitals of Manhattan and Hollywood:  Asheville, North Carolina; Austin, Texas; Jacksonville, Florida; Lincoln, Nebraska; and the Rialto Theatre in Pueblo, Colorado.

Accessing these kinds of primary sources of film history is how new historiographies can be researched and written.



 * * * * 

 * * * * 


All images from "Selling the Picture to the Public: Six Test Runs of Moana Give a Line on Best Methods of Exploiting the Film," MPW, December 12, 1925.



Dec 22, 2013

DONT LOOK BACK only rates #10

from Facebook . . .  .


Ondi Timoner

"The Guardian calls DIG! the #1 Music Film of All Time. Wow. It's a fun list too. Good ideas in here for your holiday 
viewing:)   

Dec 21, 2013

Bruno on Timoner (and Timoner on Bruno!)

A very nice turn:  the author of the previous post, our own Mr. Christopher Bruno, published this new and in-depth piece 

THE FILMMAKER IS PRESENT:  AUTHORIAL IMMERSION AND INTERVENTION IN THE FILMS OF ONDI TIMONER

on his website, Considering Film:  http://consideringfilm.com/2013/12/19/ondi-timoner/   


And then Ms. Timoner put it on her Facebook page.














And her friends like it. And not just with thumbs-up icons. But with Comments: "amazing," "lovely," "good shit." 







Congratulations, C.B.

Dec 19, 2013

On Content and Context

by Christopher Bruno


Among the very first packet of readings we were assigned were two pieces written by Terry Ramsaye for the Christian Science Monitor in 1922, "The Status of Non-Fiction Films" and "Non-Fiction Film as Propoganda."  These pieces -- or, rather, my copies of them -- are unique among my Nonfiction Film History readings in that they are relatively littered with marginalia.  I usually content myself with a highlighter, but in the case of these readings, I was equally liberal with a red pen.  Part of it, no doubt, was that classes hadn't even begun yet and I was chomping on the bit to return to academia with fervor, having allowed seven years to pass between by undergraduate and graduate studies.  But a bigger part of it was that I had found gaping holes in Ramsaye's argument and leaps of logic that I couldn't abide.  If ten percent of my final grade was to be participation, my socially anxious and normally silent self could easily earn most of it discussing these two pieces alone.
Among my hastily scribbled notes were documentation? alongside Ramsaye's unsupported -- yet, surely, not entirely false -- assertion that "there are in most audiences patrons whose major interest is in the non-fiction subjects."  Regarding Ramsaye's dismissal of the "star system" as "the simplest tool in the hands of the film salesman," I wrote presumptive and judgmental.  And when Ramsaye surmised that "This preponderance of the dramatic picture is undoubtedly out of any proportion to the real taste of the public [as] indicated by the increasingly wide circulation of non-fiction book and periodicals," I wondered, Can such deductions be made across art forms?  I took great umbrage with Ramsaye's dismissal of dramatic pictures as mere products of the star-based system of selling movies not only because of its bias and reductivism, but also because he neglected to posit what was to me and my red pen an obvious potential solution: What if stars were then involved in the producing and promotion of non-fiction works?
Ramsaye went on to make generalizations about the scant budget theaters allotted for nonfiction works ("usually less than 7 per cent... frequently less than 5 per cent") in relation to the screen time they occupied ("25 per cent") but made no concessions or considerations for the relative costs incurred in the production of a dramatic feature versus those of a nonfiction feature.  Ramsaye is also presumptive about audience tastes, insisting that the preponderance of "dramatic features and 'comedies'" in many theaters is a product solely of the curatorial discretion of theater owners without any statistics to support his argument or consideration given to the tenets of supply-and-demand.
At the bottom of the page, I wrote, The last paragraph opens the issue up from distribution to production, however the author neither synthesizes the two, nor offers any elaboration upon the effect of a presumed overhaul of the non-fiction film production industry.  While Ramsaye gently poked at these concerns in his next essay, he did so only through the rubric of "special interests seeking propaganda media."  He asserts, with implied consternation, that "To a remarkable extent scenic, travel, and 'educational' pictures are vehicles for propaganda," to which my marginalia countered, Is this good or bad?  Connotative vs. Denotative.  And indeed, though he uses it frequently throughout the piece, "films of fact" remains a loose term, and the use of word "wholesome" implies a propagandistic intent on the author's behalf as well.
When it came time to discuss these pieces in class, however, I remained silent.  Historically, anything I was assigned to read by a professor carried with it an air of authority; though we were asked to question and to engage with the material, what we were given was ultimately fact.  One of the reasons I left my job as a high school teacher and abandoned my initial undergraduate pursuit of teacher certification was that I, to a great degree, believe in the lecture format and in the authority of the professor.  A great deal of reform has gone on in the education field as of late which favors group and hands-on learning, and the adoption of these techniques was, in my estimation, detrimental to my efficacy as an educator.  I, for better or for worse, still steadfastly believe that rote learning is in many cases the best way to receive and retain information.  In a recent piece for The Atlantic ("Don't Give Up on the Lecture"), Abigail Walthausen argues that too much student-led discussion can be distracting and lead to misinformed dissemination of content.  I've always liked a professor who tells me explicitly what they want and who exhibits authority through both lecture and through the readings he or she assigns.
One of the biggest steps in shifting my manner of academic application from undergraduate to graduate level has been in learning to process the meta-textual signifiers of any work under discussion.  I remained silent about Ramsaye's works not because I suddenly thought my points were wrong, but because it was immediately apparent that the limitations and the perspectives of the time in which the articles were written was under observation as much, if not more so, than the articles themselves.  It seemed superfluous and misguided to perseverate upon these textual errors once they were exposed as being endemic of the surrounding cultural climate.  I was already accustomed to accounting for these kinds of qualifiers within films, but I had learned to do so through critical written work; it required an exponential expansion of my focus to accommodate critiquing the critique in such a manner.
This has been my greatest takeaway from this class: that fully contextualizing these works is a Sisyphean task that continually raises as many questions as it answers, if not more.  Even when arguments and observations seemed self-evident to the point of obviousness -- as, I often felt, much of Jennifer Lynn Peterson's introduction to her book Education in the School of Dreams was, for example -- it became ultimately apparent that nothing about these works or their study can be taken for granted.  A retrospective review of the syllabus yields a litany of roads not taken, of works both great and small, each with more to say than can ever be told.

Dec 18, 2013

CICERO MARCH (1966) named to the National Film Registry today

Timely as today's headlines....

We watched Cicero March as part of the Nonfiction Film History course quite recently. Today the Librarian of Congress announced it has been added to the National Film Registry, along with Men and Dust (1940, which we also watched; 
http://www.nyu.edu/orphanfilm/orphans8/mov8/Men_and_Dust.mov) and Roger and Me (1989, which is kinda where we began the discussion, with the essay Matthew Bernstein -- also a National Film Preservation Board member, by the way).  

By some definitions, these 3 titles are only documentaries on this year's list of 25 films (unless you count Mary Poppins).  Frank Stauffacher's Notes on the Port of St. Francis (1951) might be pigeonholed as an "experimental" film, but it is certainly in the nonfiction mode, an impressionistic portrait of San Francisco (narrated by Vincent Price!) and somewhat related to the city symphony tradition.  The list also includes the entry Martha Graham Early Dance Films (1931-1944), which are four silent film recording of the dancer in performance. 
And friend of the show Bill Morrison in on the list with his "found footage film" Decasia (2002). What do you think of this blurb from the LOC.gov news release? 
Cicero March (1966)
During the summer of 1966, the Chicago Freedom Movement, led by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., targeted Chicago in a drive to end de facto segregation in northern cities and ensure better housing, education and job opportunities for African Americans. After violent rioting and a month of demonstrations, the city reached an agreement with King, in part to avoid a threatened march for open housing in the neighboring all-white town of Cicero, Ill., the scene of a riot 15 years earlier when a black couple tried to move into an apartment there. King called off further demonstrations, but other activists marched in Cicero on Sept. 4, an event preserved on film in this eight-minute, cinema-vérité-styled documentary. Using lightweight, handheld equipment, the Chicago-based Film Group, Inc. filmmakers situated themselves in the midst of confrontations and captured for posterity the viciousness of northern reactions to civil-rights reforms.
Is it an apt characterization of what you saw and heard in the film?


-- Dan Streible



___________________

p.s. e-mail today from Matthew Bernstein, re: Roger and Michael:
" As I am on Michael Moore’s email list, I received this. Good work, everyone, on this year’s registry additions and best wishes for the holidays! Matthew"
Thank You, Library of Congress: 'Roger & Me' to Be Added to National Film Registry 
…a note from Michael Moore 
Wednesday, December 18th, 2013 
Friends, 
This morning it was announced by the Library of Congress and the National Film Preservation Board that my first film, 'Roger & Me', has been placed on the National Film Registry -- the official list of films that are, according to an act of Congress, to be preserved and protected for all time because of their "cultural and historical significance" to the art of cinema. It is, to say the least, a huge honor that for me ranks right up there with the Oscar and the Palme d'Or at Cannes. The National Film Registry is a slightly rarefied list of movies in the history of cinema. Of the tens of thousands of films that have been made since the 1890s, only 600 are on the preservation list. Today, in addition to 'Roger & Me', the films that were announced selection to the preservation list include 'Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?', 'Mary Poppins', 'Pulp Fiction', 'Forbidden Planet', 'The Quiet Man', 'The Magnificent Seven' and 'Judgment at Nuremberg'. These films plus 'Roger & Me' now join 'Citizen Kane', 'The Graduate', 'Dr. Strangelove' and a host of other classics that make up the National Film Registry. 
The news comes at just the right moment for 'Roger & Me'. The upcoming year, 2014, is the 25th anniversary of the film's debut. 
But last year I learned that there was not a single print of 'Roger & Me' in existence. [emphasis added. -- DGS]  Anywhere. I was stunned. I had received a call from the New York Film Festival asking if I knew where they could find a 35mm copy of the film. They were told there were no usable prints in North America -- all of them had been damaged or destroyed or had faded in color. How could the largest grossing documentary of all time in 1989 just have vanished? Poof. Gone. 
And if this could happen to 'Roger & Me', what kind of shape are other films -- especially documentaries -- in? I called up the good people of Warner Bros. to help me fix the problem -- and they did. In the end ten new prints were made and are now being donated to archival vaults at UCLA, the Motion Picture Academy, the Museum of Modern Art and the George Eastman House. 
But now, with the protection offered by the Library of Congress, 'Roger & Me' will be in good hands and around for a long time to come. 
You should know that there is a serious film preservation crisis afoot and I've volunteered to help do something about it. I often hear of other films whose prints are all gone. I have personally paid to have new prints made for a number of films ('Hair' by Milos Forman, the old Roy Rogers classic 'Don't Fence Me In', etc.) where not a single print exists. I have donated them to one of the above archival houses and I plan to keep doing this for other movies (Next up: Dalton Trumbo's 'Johnny Got His Gun'). 
As for 'Roger & Me', if you haven't seen it, check it out on iTunes or Amazon or (for a few hours for free) here. This movie, as most of you know, was my first chapter in a series of eight films that, in part, explore (often satirically) the crazy stupid thing we call "capitalism" -- a never-ending quest by the wealthy to take as much as they can, while leaving the crumbs for everyone else to fight over. Today, according to the polls, more young people say they favor the ideals of socialism over capitalism. I hope to God I played a small role in making that happen, and I look forward to the day when the rich are forced to share the wealth created by their employees. It will happen. In our lifetime. 
I thank the Library of Congress and the National Film Preservation Board for this honor. And I encourage all of you to watch my film, a film that, sadly, is every bit as relevant today as when I made it 25 years ago. 
I hope all of you are well and enjoying this holiday season. 
There is much work to do in 2014!
 Yours, 
 Michael Moore
MMFlint@MichaelMoore.com 
@MMFlint MichaelMoore.com

Dec 15, 2013

Folk, Verite, and the Failure of the Word

by Christopher Bruno


In her essay on D. A. Pennebaker's Dont Look Back, Jeanne Hall makes the argument that Pennebaker's 1967 film -- and, in fact, much of cinema verite in general -- confirms the assumption that what documentarian Robert Drew referred to as "picture logic", exemplified by the observational forms of direct cinema, is inherently more truthful, and thus better, than "word logic", the attempt to explicate through spoken or written language.  Citing Drew's 1960 film Primary as a landmark work which helped to usher in the verite movement in America, Hall makes the case that Pennebaker, despite claiming ambivalence towards any sort of message or intentionality in his filmmaking, uses a number of editorial strategies to allow his subject, a young yet already famous Bob Dylan, to make Pennebaker's point for him.

While Hall's arguments are, for the most part, both thorough and sound, there is additionally a greater narrative to be drawn regarding Dylan's own thorny relationship with the written (and henceforth sung) word, and there is perhaps no more appropriate phase of Dylan's long and storied career than that depicted in the film to illustrate it.  1965 saw Dylan's fame continuing to grow even as many of his earliest fans criticized him for abandoning the earnest folk of his earlier years in favor of a raw, electrified sound which carried with it increasingly fractured, impressionistic lyrics.  Dylan was always known for ripping a song or two straight from the headlines (even if those headlines were a few decades old); but where once he was literal, carefully delineating character, cause, and event, now he was oblique, preferring to obfuscate his meaning through free association, non-sequiturs, and abstract poetical devices.

"Subterranean Homesick Blues", being the first track from his first album in this vein, is as good a candidate as any for the exemplar of this style, and it remains not only one of his most loved songs, but also emblematic of the first of what would ultimately be many stylistic shifts and evolutions.  Pennebaker was no doubt cognizant of this when he chose to open his film with the iconic sequence of Dylan flipping cue cards of the song's lyrics in time to the recording.  Dylan, the cipher, remains tight-lipped as he presents his lyrics to the audience, as though his art were a barrier rather than a window into the artist.  And as the song progresses, the cards play fast and loose with the lyrics, intentionally misspelling or paraphrasing the words -- a sacrilege to a Dylan adherent -- while no less a wordsmith than Allen Ginsberg hangs in the background, speaking inaudibly to Bob Neuwirth, himself a noted singer-songwriter.

Gone is the young, hungry troubadour who championed the literalism and didacticism of Woody Guthrie, and one need look no further than the film itself to see so.  Pennebaker appropriates footage of a younger Dylan concertedly singing his composition "Only a Pawn in Their Game" at a voters' registration rally in 1963 as though his life depended upon it before cutting to a contemporaneous performance of "The Times They Are A-Changin'" from the Royal Albert Hall that is rote and noticeably lacking in passion by comparison.  Hall quotes Joe Morgenstern's Newsweek review of the film, which states, "Dont Look Back is really about fame and how it menaces art," a summation which is borne out in the juxtaposition of these two performances.  Dylan did not wear his fame comfortably, often reacting antagonistically to corporations, the press, and to individuals who did not follow his whims as mercurially as he himself did.  Aside from the many instances of Dylan baiting and battling with reporters, humoring his teeny-bopper fans, and ignoring the company of his compatriots which Hall enumerates, viewers can see this attitude in Dylan's changing relationship to his own words; as the stakes and the stages alike grew, the connection between his words and his fans stretched to the point of tenuousness, and Dylan would react by tossing off any and all sense of political responsibility -- and lyrical clarity.

Throughout the sixties, Greenwich Village was host to a multifaceted folk revival that would nurture and present to the world such disparate acts as Simon & Garfunkel, Dave Van Ronk, The Fugs, Peter Paul & Mary, and of course Dylan; and in April of 1961 -- only a few short months after Dylan himself had arrived in New York City -- Washington Square, long known as a haven for folksingers to congregate and perform, became the setting of a epochal showdown between the police and the peaceful protestors of the Village folk scene.  Following an injunction to ban folk singing from Washington Square, Israel Young encouraged all local folk musicians to come down to the park on April 9 to sing songs in defiance of the town's orders, an act, he insisted, was protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution.  Dan Drasin, who was himself only 18 at the time, captured the protest and the subsequent riots on film.  Painstakingly compiling and synching audio recordings from the day to his footage, he compiled the film Sunday, which in its own way addresses the issue of "picture logic" versus "word logic" and finds the former lacking.

[Note: Dan Drasin himself posted the full documentary to his YouTube channel on May 1, 2013.] 



Drasin opens the film with shots of children playing in the park before slowly introducing footage of the young adults who will be taking part in the protests, establishing a sort of universal innocence and inherent right to be present, underscored by the use of Guthrie's "This Land is Your Land" on the soundtrack.  Drasin emphasizes the point by ending the film with a shot of a child playfully running around the park wearing a sign that reads "I want to sing too!"  In between, however, he fills Sunday with a stream of law enforcement officials and folk musicians who talk in circles at one another, reiterating the same rhetoric without getting anywhere or solving anything.

There is, furthermore, a sort of self-reflexive, Ouroboros-like overtone to the entire protest, which exists solely to assert its own right to exist.  Folk music has a history of being by and of the people, concerned more so than any other musical idiom with the plight of the underprivileged, yet you wouldn't know it from the crowd assembled in Washington Square Park on this particular Sunday.  Most of those gathered are well dressed collegiate sorts, indicative not so much of the beatniks as of those who studious read and attempted to emulate them.  The folk music depicted in Sunday is by and large toothless, and while all the other jam sessions in the park before and after may well have been about something, the narrow focus of Drasin's film can't help but depict a scene that is both earnest and empty.  One protestor, when asked if he is the leader of the group, sums it up: "No, I just happen to be first."

It is ironic then that both Sunday and Dont Look Back make at least some claim to champion the folksinger, he himself the champion of words, for both films systematically attack the established norms of verbal communication as outmoded and incomplete.  While Drasin may have unwittingly exposed his subjects, Pennebaker and Dylan seem to be in collusion; for while the well meaning young folkies in Sunday probably arrived with the best of intentions, Dylan stepped in front of his documentarian's "fearsome machinery" primed to dismantle the old guard, and Pennebaker was more than willing to let him.  As Pennebaker himself has said, "If I just watch what is happening, it will happen right in front of me."